|
|
|
|
What's Powerful and Unique Claims
Recovery?
Rx-1
$$$$$$$$$ERISA $$$$$$$$$$
Rx-2
Are All
Consultants Corrupt? (Fast Company)
|
Denials +
Recoupment =
Inflation +
Fraud or
Cost-Sharing?
Rx =
Compliant Denial & Appeals! |
|
Forbes.com: "Roughly one in seven Americans has
no health insurance. That hurts HCA Inc. (nyse:
HCA -
news
-
people), the largest U.S. hospital chain, which
last year wrote off $2.21 billion
of revenue because patients couldn't pay their
bills."
The American Hospital Association (AHA): "Hospitals today are faced with the challenge of managing their
limited resources, while continuing to deliver the highest standard of care.
According to health care experts, the cost of clinical
denials to individual healthcare organizations averages
$3.3 million
annually. However, many hospitals do not have the resources or the
expertise needed to avoid unpaid days at the end of admissions and lead the
denial-appeals processes."
Payments Go Under a Microscope (washingtonpost.com)
"MAMSI and CareFirst recoup overpayments to doctors by making
deductions from future reimbursements.
Doctors can appeal insurers' decisions.
But, in the end, they usually pay up, doctors and insurers agree."
Hospital Pricing and the Uninsured,
Glenn Melnick, Ph.D.,
"Price
Gouging"
(Subcommittee on Health
Hearing on the Uninsured,
U.S.
FILES COMPLAINT AGAINST NATIONAL ACCOUNTING FIRM UNDER FALSE CLAIMS ACT
(DOJ
Press Release) "January 5, 2004
- PHILADELPHIA –
United States Attorney Patrick L. Meehan announced today the filing of the
Government's
complaint against national accounting firm Ernst & Young.
According to the complaint, nine hospitals paid Ernst & Young for billing
advice – advice which later caused the submission of false claims to the
Medicare program."
USATODAY.com - Hospitals Sock Uninsured with Much Bigger Bills
GM to Report $60B in Future Health-Care Obligations
HMOs Earn $10.2 Billion in 2003,
Nearly Doubling Profits, According to Weiss Ratings; Blue Cross Blue Shield
Plans Report 63% Jump in Earnings
(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 30, 2004
|
Under the federal law, ERISA, any payment less than 100% claimed or
billed is considered as a denial, including retrospective claim denials
as a result of claim audit retrospectively,
overpayment/refund request, it is a
question of whether the denial was made appropriately in accordance with
the ERISA and
governing plan document,
SPD.
Title 29 U.S.C. § 1141 states:
"It shall be unlawful for any
person through the use of fraud, force, violence, or threat of
the use of force or violence, to restrain, coerce, intimidate,
or attempt to restrain, coerce, or intimidate any participant or
beneficiary for the purpose of interfering with or preventing
the exercise of any right to which he is or may become entitled
under the plan, this title, section 3001, or the Welfare and
Pension Plans Disclosure Act. Any person who willfully violates
this section shall be fined $10,000 or imprisoned for not more
than one year, or both. The amount of fine is governed by 18
U.S.C. § 3571. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines address 29 U.S.C.
§ 1141 under the guidelines for "Fraud and Deceit" (U.S.S.G. §
2F1.1) or for "Extortion by Force or Threat of Injury or Serious
Damage (U.S.S.G. § 2B3.2)......"
"For example, Section 1141
would reach the use of deception directed
at misleading a welfare plan beneficiary as to the amount of
health benefits owed to the beneficiary under the terms of the
plan or at misleading a pension plan participant as to
the amount of retirement benefits to which he would become
entitled under the plan upon his retirement."
ERISA in the United States Code
|
We will appeal any
denials make inappropriately and recover the money in compliance
with federal law,
ERISA and in accordance with individual
governing plan document,
SPD.
"Forty
states required individuals to first exhaust their health policy’s
internal appeals and grievance process before seeking external review."
(GAO, September 2003, Page 46) The health policy’s internal
appeals and grievance process =
ERISA
appeals 80% of the time.
Forbes.com: "Roughly one in seven Americans
has no health insurance. That hurts HCA Inc. (nyse:
HCA -
news
-
people), the largest U.S. hospital chain, which
last year wrote off $2.21 billion
of revenue because patients couldn't pay their
bills."
The American Hospital Association (AHA):
"Hospitals today are faced with the challenge of managing their limited
resources, while continuing to deliver the highest standard of care.
According to health care experts, the cost of clinical
denials to individual healthcare organizations averages
$3.3 million
annually. However, many hospitals do not have the resources or the
expertise needed to avoid unpaid days at the end of admissions and lead the
denial-appeals processes."
|
Who Can Be a Medical Reviewer under ERISA?
(Copyright © 2004
by
Jin Zhou,
ERISAclaim.com)
U.S.
SUPREME COURT
Docket for 03-83
ORAL ARGUMENT TRANSCRIPTS (page
46 0f 49)
| 02-1845.
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila |
03/23/04 |
"QUESTION: Mr.
Estrada, you can address what you would like but there are three
points that have come up during the Respondent's presentation
that I'd be interested with a response to.
Number one, is it true
that the people who make the decisions for your client must be
medical doctors in Texas?
MR. ESTRADA:
Well it is true by virtue of DOL regulations which provide that
no claim may be turned down without input from a medical
professional in the relevant area"
|
|
New
Federal Claim Regulation (Final Rule)
-
"Plans must
consult with
appropriate health care
professionals in
deciding appealed claims
involving medical judgment."
[70268-70269,
CFR § 2560.503-1(h)(3)(iii)]
-
"The term `health care professional' means a
physician or other health care professional licensed, accredited, or
certified to perform specified health
services
consistent with State law." [page
70271
CFR § 2560.503-1(m)(7)]
 |
"medical doctors in Texas"
=
MD licensed to practice medicine in Texas
for a Texas ERISA case;
|
 |
"a medical professional in the
relevant area" = relevant area of state laws in license
jurisdiction, scope of practice and relevant local standard of care;
|
 |
"licensed"
= licensed by the State Government/licensing board;
|
 |
"to
perform"
= to practice medicine or health care services in the
State;
|
 |
"specified
health services"
= medical procedures or services being reviewed or denied, instead of
file review or insurance coverage reviews
services;
|
 |
"consistent with State law"
= consistent with State laws where the health care professional is
legally licensed to practice medicine or health care services with
respect to state jurisdictions, scope of license and state local
medical standard of care.
|
"The term `health care professional' means, in layman term, a
physician or other health care professional who is at least licensed in
your state (and more, board certified too) to practice the
specified/specific health services being reviewed or denied of your
claims, consistent with your state law jurisdiction, scope of practice
and local medical standard of care. Someone who is not licensed to
practice the same health care services specified/denied in your claims
is not qualified as an "appropriate health care
professionals" as defined under ERISA
§ 2560.503-1(m)(7).
Someone who is not licensed in your state to
practice "specified health services" but who is merely registered under
state or other means (URAC, IME, SSD or Peer Reviews) to do Utilization
Reviews (UR)
is not qualified as an "appropriate health care
professionals" as defined under ERISA
§ 2560.503-1(m)(7).
U.S.
Supreme Court visited ERISAclaim.com in regard to ERISA
§ 2560.503-1(h) at 11:57:03 AM on Friday,
November 21, 2003 for this No. one point.
Click here for more coverage of
Supreme Court Visiting at ERISAClaim.com.
|
|
 |
Medical Fraud Every Day?
Appeal or Re-Bill After
Denial?
You Must APPEAL
No Re-Billing!!!
Claim Appeal
or
Sentencing Appeal?
Your Choice |
|
Aetna:
Leading the Fight Against Health Care Fraud
[PDF]
View as HTML
"Thanks to this highly collaborative
relationship, we know how to identify fraud because we know what
to look for.
Medical Fraud
-
Unusual provider billing practices.
Discrepancy between the submitted diagnosis and the treatment.
Diagnoses or treatments that are outside the practitioner’s
scope of practice.
Claims that are resubmitted
with coding changes to gain benefits.
Alterations on claim
submissions.
Pressure for quick claim payment."
Payments Go Under a Microscope (washingtonpost.com)
January 12, 2004
"MAMSI and CareFirst
recoup overpayments to doctors by making
deductions from future reimbursements.
Doctors can appeal insurers' decisions.
But, in the end, they usually pay up, doctors and insurers
agree."
Employers Audit Workers' Health Claims
(Wall Street Journal via SFGate.com)
Excerpt: "Looking to
bring down soaring health-care costs anywhere they can, more
employers are scouring their health plans for fraud, abuse and
simple mistakes by employees or administrators.
.......The
number of requests for such audits jumped 50 percent last year,
Mr. Farley estimates."
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Announces New Strike
Force to Protect American Consumers from Fraud and Fight Rising
Costs (U.S.
Newswire, 4/19/2004)
"DETROIT, April 19 /U.S.
Newswire/ -- The Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA)
today announced a new Anti-Fraud Strike Force comprised of top
Blue Plan investigators that will work with the Federal Bureau
of Investigation (FBI) and other national, state and local law
enforcement agencies to fight major insurance fraud schemes that
rob consumers of millions of dollars annually. BCBSA President
and CEO Scott P. Serota announced the new initiative in a speech
to the Detroit Economic Club."
Clinton Township Firm Convicted of
Overbilling (Macomb
Daily)
"The case is somewhat
unusual in that a corporation was named as a criminal defendant
in the case,
but Kaiser said that is not unheard of since corporate law can
make a firm liable for criminal wrongdoing, and its principal
office holders in return are responsible for any judgments or
punishments the courts impose.
David Griem,
the defense attorney for Emergency Management who was also named
the principal to enter a guilty plea on its behalf,
also could not be reached for comment after the sentencing
hearing. In court, however, he turned over a check to the Blue
Cross insurance company officials in attendance and said the
company would pay the $5,000 court costs on time as well."
|
Health Care Fraud Report
Fiscal Year 1998

|
USDOJ: Deputy Attorney General:
Publications and Documents - - Health Care Fraud Report Fiscal
Year 1998
"On June 4,
1998, in the District of Maryland, Levindale Geriatric
Hospital paid $800,000 to resolve allegations it violated the
FCA by recoding and resubmitting denied
charges for room and board. After the claims for room and
board were denied by the Medicare Part A program, Levindale
recoded the claims as supplies, laboratory work and other
services, and submitted the claims for payment. In
addition to paying a substantial penalty under the FCA,
Levindale entered into a compliance agreement with HHS-OIG"
|
|
"A
Breaking News
950,000 MD's Settled With Aetna & Cigna on ERISA
"Aetna
and CIGNA Settlement Secrets"
"Talking
Points"
| |